Buick Rendezvous MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Buick Rendezvous MPG by Years

Buick Rendezvous MPG - Choose Generation

Quick Notes on Buick Rendezvous MPG

    • average 2002 Buick Rendezvous MPG: 21 MPG / 11.2 L per 100 km
    • worst 2002 Buick Rendezvous MPG: 17 MPG / 13.8 L per 100 km
    • best 2002 Buick Rendezvous MPG: 27 MPG / 8.7 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1900 kg / 4190 lbs
    • body type: off-road vehicle
    • difference highway / city: 28%
    • average engine power: 160 kW / 217 hp
    • difference from world average: 34% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 395 miles (636 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

2002 Buick Rendezvous MPG (Miles per Gallon)

2002 Buick Rendezvous MPG is between 17 MPG and 27 MPG depending on engine:

  • 3.4 i V6 FWD — 19 to 26 MPG
  • 3.4 i V6 AWD — 17 to 24 MPG
  • 3.5 i V6 AWD — 18 to 23 MPG
  • 3.5 i V6 FWD — 19 to 26 MPG
  • 3.6 i V6 24V FWD — 18 to 27 MPG
  • 3.6 i V6 24V AWD — 18 to 25 MPG
  • 3.8 i V6 24V Ultra FWD — 17 to 24 MPG

    2002 Buick Rendezvous MPG to weight ratio

    The 2002 Buick Rendezvous MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.4 i V6 FWD — 85 kg/mpg
  • 3.4 i V6 AWD — 92 kg/mpg
  • 3.5 i V6 AWD — 97 kg/mpg
  • 3.5 i V6 FWD — 85 kg/mpg
  • 3.6 i V6 24V FWD — 86 kg/mpg
  • 3.6 i V6 24V AWD — 93 kg/mpg
  • 3.8 i V6 24V Ultra FWD — 90 kg/mpg

    2002 Buick Rendezvous MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2002 Buick Rendezvous MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 3.4 i V6 FWD is 31% less economical than average car
  • 3.4 i V6 AWD is 34% less economical than average car
  • 3.5 i V6 AWD is 37% less economical than average car
  • 3.5 i V6 FWD is 31% less economical than average car
  • 3.6 i V6 24V FWD is 31% less economical than average car
  • 3.6 i V6 24V AWD is 34% less economical than average car
  • 3.8 i V6 24V Ultra FWD is 34% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 2002 Buick RendezVous MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.4 i V6 FWD 19 / 26 MPG
    (12.4 / 9.1 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person
    3.4 i V6 AWD 17 / 24 MPG
    (13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    3.5 i V6 AWD 18 / 23 MPG
    (13.1 / 10.2 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    3.5 i V6 FWD 19 / 26 MPG
    (12.4 / 9.1 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person
    3.6 i V6 24V FWD 18 / 27 MPG
    (13.1 / 8.7 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    3.6 i V6 24V AWD 18 / 25 MPG
    (13.1 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    3.8 i V6 24V Ultra FWD 17 / 24 MPG
    (13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2002 Buick RendezVous MPG

    Vehicle 3.4 i V6 FWD
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 26 MPG
    (12.4 / 9.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.4 i V6 AWD
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 24 MPG
    (13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.5 i V6 AWD
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 23 MPG
    (13.1 / 10.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.5 i V6 FWD
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 26 MPG
    (12.4 / 9.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.6 i V6 24V FWD
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 27 MPG
    (13.1 / 8.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.6 i V6 24V AWD
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 25 MPG
    (13.1 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.8 i V6 24V Ultra FWD
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 24 MPG
    (13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person