2018 Buick Regal MPG is 22 MPG on engine:
The 2018 Buick Regal MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Buick Regal MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 V6 |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.9 / 10.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.9 / 10.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
2018 Buick Regal MPG is 29 MPG on engine:
The 2018 Buick Regal MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Buick Regal MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
21
/
29 MPG
(11.2 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
-
|
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
29 MPG
(11.2 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2014 Buick Regal MPG is between 19 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:
The 2014 Buick Regal MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2014 Buick Regal MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
20
/
31 MPG
(11.8 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 |
19
/
30 MPG
(12.4 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
31 MPG
(11.8 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
30 MPG
(12.4 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2009 Buick Regal MPG is between 19 MPG and 40 MPG depending on engine:
The 2009 Buick Regal MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2009 Buick Regal MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.4 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 |
22
/
40 MPG
(10.6 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.4 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
40 MPG
(10.6 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Regal Buick Regal MPG is between 21 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The Regal Buick Regal MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Regal Buick Regal MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i V6 |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.9 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.0i V6 |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
- | 9% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.9 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1996 Buick Regal MPG is 27 MPG on engine:
The 1996 Buick Regal MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Buick Regal MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.8 V6 |
18
/
27 MPG
(13.1 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
27 MPG
(13.1 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
1988 Buick Regal MPG is between 19 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:
The 1988 Buick Regal MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1988 Buick Regal MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.8 V6 |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.1 V6 |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.1 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1988 Buick Regal MPG is between 19 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:
The 1988 Buick Regal MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1988 Buick Regal MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.8 V6 |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
3.8 V6 |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.1 V6 |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.1 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Regal Buick Regal MPG is between 18 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The Regal Buick Regal MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Regal Buick Regal MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.8 V6 |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.1 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
4.3 V8 |
18
/
27 MPG
(13.1 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
4.3d V6 |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
5.7d V8 |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
5.0 V8 |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.1 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.1 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.3 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
27 MPG
(13.1 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.3d V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.7d V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.1 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
1978 Buick Regal MPG is between 17 MPG and 27 MPG depending on engine:
The 1978 Buick Regal MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1978 Buick Regal MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.3 V8 |
17
/
26 MPG
(13.8 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
3.8 V6 |
19
/
25 MPG
(12.4 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
4.9 V8 |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
5.0 V8 |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.2 V6 |
20
/
27 MPG
(11.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.3 V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
26 MPG
(13.8 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
25 MPG
(12.4 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.9 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
27 MPG
(11.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
1978 Buick Regal MPG is between 19 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 1978 Buick Regal MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1978 Buick Regal MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.1 V6 |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.8 V6 |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
5.7d V8 |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
4.3d V6 |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.1 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.7d V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.3d V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Regal Buick Regal MPG is between 19 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The Regal Buick Regal MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Regal Buick Regal MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.8 V6 |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
4.1 V6 |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
5.7d V8 |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.1 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.7d V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |