2016 Bentley Mulsanne MPG is between 10 MPG and 24 MPG depending on engine:
The 2016 Bentley Mulsanne MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 Bentley Mulsanne MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.75 V8 |
10
/
24 MPG
(22.8 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—621 miles
(400—1000 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Speed 6.75 V8 |
10
/
24 MPG
(22.8 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—621 miles
(400—1000 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 6.75 V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
10
/
24 MPG
(22.8 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—621 miles (400—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Speed 6.75 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
10
/
24 MPG
(22.8 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—621 miles (400—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
2016 Bentley Mulsanne MPG is 24 MPG on engine:
The 2016 Bentley Mulsanne MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 Bentley Mulsanne MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.75 V8 |
10
/
24 MPG
(22.8 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—621 miles
(400—1000 km) |
3.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 6.75 V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
10
/
24 MPG
(22.8 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—621 miles (400—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.7 L per 100 km / person |
1980 Bentley Mulsanne MPG is 17 MPG on engine:
The 1980 Bentley Mulsanne MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1980 Bentley Mulsanne MPG is up to 63% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.75 i V8 |
9
/
17 MPG
(24.8 / 13.5 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 6.75 i V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
9
/
17 MPG
(24.8 / 13.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.8 L per 100 km / person |