2020 Audi RS 6 MPG is 26 MPG on engine:
The 2020 Audi RS 6 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2020 Audi RS 6 MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.0 TFSI V8 |
15
/
26 MPG
(16.2 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 TFSI V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
26 MPG
(16.2 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Audi RS 6 MPG is between 17 MPG and 32 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Audi RS 6 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Audi RS 6 MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.0 TFSI V8 performance |
18
/
32 MPG
(13.4 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
4.0 TFSI |
17
/
31 MPG
(13.9 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 TFSI V8 performance |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
32 MPG
(13.4 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 TFSI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
31 MPG
(13.9 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Audi RS 6 MPG is 23 MPG on engine:
The 2008 Audi RS 6 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Audi RS 6 MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 TFSI V10 |
12
/
23 MPG
(20.3 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.0 TFSI V10 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
12
/
23 MPG
(20.3 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Audi RS 6 MPG is 23 MPG on engine:
The 2008 Audi RS 6 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Audi RS 6 MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 TFSI V10 |
12
/
23 MPG
(20.1 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.0 TFSI V10 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
12
/
23 MPG
(20.1 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
2002 Audi RS 6 MPG is 23 MPG on engine:
The 2002 Audi RS 6 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Audi RS 6 MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.2 BiTurbo V8 |
11
/
23 MPG
(21.8 / 10.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.2 BiTurbo V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
11
/
23 MPG
(21.8 / 10.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
2002 Audi RS 6 MPG is 23 MPG on engine:
The 2002 Audi RS 6 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Audi RS 6 MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.2 BiTurbo V8 |
11
/
23 MPG
(21.8 / 10.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.2 BiTurbo V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
11
/
23 MPG
(21.8 / 10.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |