2020 Audi RS 4 MPG is 33 MPG on engine:
The 2020 Audi RS 4 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2020 Audi RS 4 MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.9 TFSI V6 |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 TFSI V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2018 Audi RS 4 MPG is 33 MPG on engine:
The 2018 Audi RS 4 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Audi RS 4 MPG is up to 16% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.9 TFSI |
20
/
33 MPG
(11.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 TFSI |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
33 MPG
(11.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Audi RS 4 MPG is 28 MPG on engine:
The 2012 Audi RS 4 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Audi RS 4 MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.2 FSI V8 |
16
/
28 MPG
(14.6 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.2 FSI V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
28 MPG
(14.6 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Audi RS 4 MPG is 23 MPG on engine:
The 2006 Audi RS 4 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Audi RS 4 MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.2 FSI V8 32V |
12
/
23 MPG
(19.9 / 10.3 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
186—373 miles
(300—600 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.2 FSI V8 32V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
12
/
23 MPG
(19.9 / 10.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 186—373 miles (300—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.8 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Audi RS 4 MPG is 25 MPG on engine:
The 2006 Audi RS 4 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Audi RS 4 MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.2 FSI V8 32V |
11
/
25 MPG
(20.7 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
186—435 miles
(300—700 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.2 FSI V8 32V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
11
/
25 MPG
(20.7 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 186—435 miles (300—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Audi RS 4 MPG is 23 MPG on engine:
The 2006 Audi RS 4 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Audi RS 4 MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.2 FSI V8 32V |
12
/
23 MPG
(19.7 / 10.1 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
186—373 miles
(300—600 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.2 FSI V8 32V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
12
/
23 MPG
(19.7 / 10.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 186—373 miles (300—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Audi RS 4 MPG is 26 MPG on engine:
The 2000 Audi RS 4 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Audi RS 4 MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 T V6 |
14
/
26 MPG
(17 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7 T V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
26 MPG
(17 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |