1987 Audi 90 MPG is between 19 MPG and 62 MPG depending on engine:
The 1987 Audi 90 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1987 Audi 90 MPG is up to 37% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 E 20V |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.5 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 E CAT |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 E CAT |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.5 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 E |
19
/
35 MPG
(12.6 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 E 20V |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.5 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 E |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 TD |
34
/
62 MPG
(6.9 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
621—1118 miles
(1000—1800 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 E |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 E 20V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.5 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 E CAT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 E CAT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.5 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 E |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
35 MPG
(12.6 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 E 20V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.5 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 E |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
62 MPG
(6.9 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—1118 miles (1000—1800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 E |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1984 Audi 90 MPG is between 20 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 1984 Audi 90 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1984 Audi 90 MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 E |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 E |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 CAT |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 E |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 E |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 CAT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |