Audi 80 MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Audi 80 MPG by Years

Quick Notes on Audi 80 MPG

    • average 1992 Audi 80 MPG: 28 MPG / 9 L per 100 km
    • worst 1992 Audi 80 MPG: 17 MPG / 13.5 L per 100 km
    • best 1992 Audi 80 MPG: 46 MPG / 5.1 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1470 kg / 3241 lbs
    • body type: station wagon (estate)
    • difference highway / city: 38%
    • average engine power: 112 kW / 152 hp
    • difference from world average: 13% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 621 miles (1000 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

1992 Audi 80 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

1992 Audi 80 MPG is between 17 MPG and 46 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.2 S2 — 20 to 29 MPG
  • 2.6 V6 — 17 to 31 MPG
  • 1.9 TDI — 31 to 44 MPG
  • 2.0 E 16V — 22 to 32 MPG
  • 2.3 E — 20 to 36 MPG
  • 2.0 E — 20 to 38 MPG
  • 2.8 V6 E — 17 to 31 MPG
  • 2.0 — 22 to 35 MPG
  • 1.9 TD — 30 to 46 MPG
  • 2.2 RS2 — 19 to 27 MPG
  • 2.8 E V6 — 17 to 30 MPG

    1992 Audi 80 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1992 Audi 80 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.2 S2 — 68 kg/mpg
  • 2.6 V6 — 55 kg/mpg
  • 1.9 TDI — 38 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 E 16V — 50 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 E — 49 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 E — 41 kg/mpg
  • 2.8 V6 E — 53 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 — 44 kg/mpg
  • 1.9 TD — 36 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 RS2 — 73 kg/mpg
  • 2.8 E V6 — 61 kg/mpg

    1992 Audi 80 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1992 Audi 80 MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.

  • 2.2 S2 is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.6 V6 is 22% less economical than average car
  • 1.9 TDI is 13% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 E 16V is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 E is 16% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 E is 3% less economical than average car
  • 2.8 V6 E is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 is 13% less economical than average car
  • 1.9 TD is 9% more economical than average car
  • 2.2 RS2 is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.8 E V6 is 25% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1992 Audi 80 V Avant (B4, Typ 8C) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.2 S2 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.6 V6 17 / 31 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 TDI 31 / 44 MPG
    (7.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% better -
    1.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 E 16V 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 E 20 / 36 MPG
    (11.8 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 373—621 miles
    (600—1000 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 E 20 / 38 MPG
    (11.5 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person
    2.8 V6 E 17 / 31 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 22 / 35 MPG
    (10.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 373—621 miles
    (600—1000 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 TD 30 / 46 MPG
    (7.9 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% better 497—808 miles
    (800—1300 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 RS2 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.8 E V6 17 / 30 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1992 Audi 80 V Avant (B4, Typ 8C) MPG

    Vehicle 2.2 S2
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.6 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 31 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9 TDI
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 44 MPG
    (7.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% better
    Driving range (full tank) -
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 E 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 36 MPG
    (11.8 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—621 miles (600—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 38 MPG
    (11.5 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.8 V6 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 31 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 35 MPG
    (10.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—621 miles (600—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 30 / 46 MPG
    (7.9 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—808 miles (800—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 RS2
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.8 E V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 30 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 80 MPG

      • average 1991 Audi 80 MPG: 29 MPG / 8.7 L per 100 km
      • worst 1991 Audi 80 MPG: 17 MPG / 13.5 L per 100 km
      • best 1991 Audi 80 MPG: 62 MPG / 3.8 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1430 kg / 3153 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 39%
      • average engine power: 96 kW / 130 hp
      • difference from world average: 9% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 789 miles (1269 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    1991 Audi 80 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1991 Audi 80 MPG is between 17 MPG and 62 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.6 E V6 — 19 to 35 MPG
  • 2.3 E — 18 to 32 MPG
  • 2.8 V6 E — 17 to 31 MPG
  • 1.9 TDI — 38 to 62 MPG
  • 2.0 E 16V — 22 to 31 MPG
  • 2.0 E — 23 to 34 MPG
  • 2.2 S2 — 20 to 29 MPG
  • 1.6 E — 24 to 34 MPG
  • 1.6 — 24 to 43 MPG
  • 2.0 — 23 to 34 MPG
  • 1.9 TD — 30 to 46 MPG
  • 2.6 V6 — 18 to 30 MPG
  • 2.8 E V6 — 17 to 30 MPG

    1991 Audi 80 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1991 Audi 80 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.6 E V6 — 49 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 E — 53 kg/mpg
  • 2.8 V6 E — 51 kg/mpg
  • 1.9 TDI — 28 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 E 16V — 55 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 E — 49 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 S2 — 66 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 E — 46 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 — 30 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 — 44 kg/mpg
  • 1.9 TD — 36 kg/mpg
  • 2.6 V6 — 60 kg/mpg
  • 2.8 E V6 — 60 kg/mpg

    1991 Audi 80 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1991 Audi 80 MPG is up to 41% better than the world average consumption.

  • 2.6 E V6 is 16% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 E is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.8 V6 E is 19% less economical than average car
  • 1.9 TDI is 41% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 E 16V is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 E is 16% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 S2 is 28% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 E is 16% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 is 6% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 is 16% less economical than average car
  • 1.9 TD is 9% more economical than average car
  • 2.6 V6 is 25% less economical than average car
  • 2.8 E V6 is 25% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1991 Audi 80 V (B4, Typ 8C) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.6 E V6 19 / 35 MPG
    (12.3 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 E 18 / 32 MPG
    (12.9 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.8 V6 E 17 / 31 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 TDI 38 / 62 MPG
    (6.2 / 3.8 L per 100 km)
    2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% better 684—1056 miles
    (1100—1700 km)
    1 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 E 16V 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 E 23 / 34 MPG
    (10.1 / 7 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 S2 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.6 / 8.1 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 E 24 / 34 MPG
    (9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse -
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 24 / 43 MPG
    (9.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% better 435—746 miles
    (700—1200 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 23 / 34 MPG
    (10.1 / 7 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 435—559 miles
    (700—900 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 TD 30 / 46 MPG
    (7.9 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% better 497—808 miles
    (800—1300 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.6 V6 18 / 30 MPG
    (13.3 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    2.8 E V6 17 / 30 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1991 Audi 80 V (B4, Typ 8C) MPG

    Vehicle 2.6 E V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 35 MPG
    (12.3 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 32 MPG
    (12.9 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.8 V6 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 31 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9 TDI
    Consumption (city / highway) 38 / 62 MPG
    (6.2 / 3.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% better
    Driving range (full tank) 684—1056 miles (1100—1700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 E 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 34 MPG
    (10.1 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 S2
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.6 / 8.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 34 MPG
    (9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) -
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 43 MPG
    (9.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% better
    Driving range (full tank) 435—746 miles (700—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 34 MPG
    (10.1 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—559 miles (700—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 30 / 46 MPG
    (7.9 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—808 miles (800—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.6 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 30 MPG
    (13.3 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.8 E V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 30 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 80 MPG

      • average 1990 Audi 80 MPG: 31 MPG / 7.5 L per 100 km
      • worst 1990 Audi 80 MPG: 19 MPG / 12.2 L per 100 km
      • best 1990 Audi 80 MPG: 56 MPG / 4.2 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1170 kg / 2580 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 32%
      • average engine power: 68 kW / 92 hp
      • difference from world average: 3% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 821 miles (1321 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    1990 Audi 80 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1990 Audi 80 MPG is between 19 MPG and 56 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.6 CAT — 28 to 40 MPG
  • 1.8 S — 24 to 35 MPG
  • 2.0 E 16V — 19 to 36 MPG
  • 1.9 D — 37 to 52 MPG
  • 1.6 TD — 39 to 56 MPG
  • 1.8 CAT — 23 to 34 MPG
  • 2.0 CAT — 24 to 35 MPG

    1990 Audi 80 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1990 Audi 80 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.6 CAT — 32 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 S — 37 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 E 16V — 51 kg/mpg
  • 1.9 D — 26 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 TD — 25 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 CAT — 42 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 CAT — 42 kg/mpg

    1990 Audi 80 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1990 Audi 80 MPG is up to 37% better than the world average consumption.

  • 1.6 CAT is 0% more economical than average car
  • 1.8 S is 13% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 E 16V is 22% less economical than average car
  • 1.9 D is 31% more economical than average car
  • 1.6 TD is 37% more economical than average car
  • 1.8 CAT is 16% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 CAT is 13% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1990 Audi 80 IV (B3, Typ 89,89Q,8A, facelift 1990) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.6 CAT 28 / 40 MPG
    (8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 0% 497—746 miles
    (800—1200 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 S 24 / 35 MPG
    (9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 E 16V 19 / 36 MPG
    (12.2 / 6.5 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 D 37 / 52 MPG
    (6.4 / 4.5 L per 100 km)
    2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% better 684—932 miles
    (1100—1500 km)
    1.1 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 TD 39 / 56 MPG
    (6.1 / 4.2 L per 100 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% better 684—994 miles
    (1100—1600 km)
    1.1 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 CAT 23 / 34 MPG
    (10.1 / 7 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 CAT 24 / 35 MPG
    (9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1990 Audi 80 IV (B3, Typ 89,89Q,8A, facelift 1990) MPG

    Vehicle 1.6 CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 28 / 40 MPG
    (8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 0% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—746 miles (800—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 S
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 35 MPG
    (9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 E 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 36 MPG
    (12.2 / 6.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 37 / 52 MPG
    (6.4 / 4.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% better
    Driving range (full tank) 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 39 / 56 MPG
    (6.1 / 4.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% better
    Driving range (full tank) 684—994 miles (1100—1600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 34 MPG
    (10.1 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 35 MPG
    (9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 80 MPG

      • average 1986 Audi 80 MPG: 32 MPG / 7.2 L per 100 km
      • worst 1986 Audi 80 MPG: 21 MPG / 11.2 L per 100 km
      • best 1986 Audi 80 MPG: 52 MPG / 4.5 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1170 kg / 2580 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 35%
      • average engine power: 66 kW / 90 hp
      • difference from world average: 0%
      • max distance with full tank: 813 miles (1308 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    1986 Audi 80 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1986 Audi 80 MPG is between 21 MPG and 52 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.8 S — 22 to 39 MPG
  • 2.0 E — 23 to 44 MPG
  • 1.8 E — 21 to 32 MPG
  • 1.6 D — 37 to 52 MPG
  • 1.8 CAT — 28 to 40 MPG
  • 1.6 — 28 to 40 MPG
  • 1.6 CAT — 25 to 44 MPG
  • 1.6 TD — 39 to 52 MPG
  • 1.8 E CAT — 27 to 39 MPG
  • 1.8 — 25 to 36 MPG
  • 1.9 D — 37 to 52 MPG
  • 2.0 — 23 to 44 MPG

    1986 Audi 80 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1986 Audi 80 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.8 S — 33 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 E — 35 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 E — 34 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 D — 25 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 CAT — 32 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 — 32 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 CAT — 31 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 TD — 24 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 E CAT — 34 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 — 41 kg/mpg
  • 1.9 D — 26 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 — 42 kg/mpg

    1986 Audi 80 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1986 Audi 80 MPG is up to 41% better than the world average consumption.

  • 1.8 S is 3% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 E is 3% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 E is 3% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 D is 31% more economical than average car
  • 1.8 CAT is 0% more economical than average car
  • 1.6 is 0% more economical than average car
  • 1.6 CAT is 3% more economical than average car
  • 1.6 TD is 41% more economical than average car
  • 1.8 E CAT is 3% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 is 13% less economical than average car
  • 1.9 D is 31% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 is 13% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1986 Audi 80 IV (B3, Typ 89,89Q,8A) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.8 S 22 / 39 MPG
    (10.6 / 6 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 E 23 / 44 MPG
    (10.4 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 435—808 miles
    (700—1300 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 E 21 / 32 MPG
    (11.2 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 D 37 / 52 MPG
    (6.4 / 4.5 L per 100 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% better 684—932 miles
    (1100—1500 km)
    1.1 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 CAT 28 / 40 MPG
    (8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 0% 497—746 miles
    (800—1200 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 28 / 40 MPG
    (8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 0% 497—746 miles
    (800—1200 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 CAT 25 / 44 MPG
    (9.6 / 5.4 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% better 435—808 miles
    (700—1300 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 TD 39 / 52 MPG
    (6 / 4.5 L per 100 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% better 684—932 miles
    (1100—1500 km)
    1 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 E CAT 27 / 39 MPG
    (8.6 / 6 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 D 37 / 52 MPG
    (6.4 / 4.5 L per 100 km)
    2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% better 684—932 miles
    (1100—1500 km)
    1.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 23 / 44 MPG
    (10.4 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 435—808 miles
    (700—1300 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1986 Audi 80 IV (B3, Typ 89,89Q,8A) MPG

    Vehicle 1.8 S
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 39 MPG
    (10.6 / 6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 44 MPG
    (10.4 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—808 miles (700—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 32 MPG
    (11.2 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 37 / 52 MPG
    (6.4 / 4.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% better
    Driving range (full tank) 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 28 / 40 MPG
    (8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 0% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—746 miles (800—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6
    Consumption (city / highway) 28 / 40 MPG
    (8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 0% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—746 miles (800—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 44 MPG
    (9.6 / 5.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% better
    Driving range (full tank) 435—808 miles (700—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 39 / 52 MPG
    (6 / 4.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% better
    Driving range (full tank) 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 E CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 27 / 39 MPG
    (8.6 / 6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 37 / 52 MPG
    (6.4 / 4.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% better
    Driving range (full tank) 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 44 MPG
    (10.4 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—808 miles (700—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 80 MPG

      • average 1984 Audi 80 MPG: 31 MPG / 7.5 L per 100 km
      • worst 1984 Audi 80 MPG: 22 MPG / 10.9 L per 100 km
      • best 1984 Audi 80 MPG: 49 MPG / 4.8 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1090 kg / 2403 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 37%
      • average engine power: 61 kW / 83 hp
      • difference from world average: 3% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 725 miles (1167 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    1984 Audi 80 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1984 Audi 80 MPG is between 22 MPG and 49 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.6 D — 33 to 47 MPG
  • 1.6 C — 24 to 36 MPG
  • 1.6 TD — 34 to 49 MPG
  • 2.0 CAT — 23 to 44 MPG
  • 1.8 CC — 25 to 36 MPG
  • 1.3 C — 25 to 38 MPG
  • 1.8 GTE — 22 to 39 MPG
  • 1.8 GT — 25 to 38 MPG

    1984 Audi 80 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1984 Audi 80 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.6 D — 26 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 C — 34 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 TD — 26 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 CAT — 35 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 CC — 35 kg/mpg
  • 1.3 C — 27 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 GTE — 35 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 GT — 42 kg/mpg

    1984 Audi 80 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1984 Audi 80 MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.

  • 1.6 D is 16% more economical than average car
  • 1.6 C is 13% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 TD is 22% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 CAT is 3% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 CC is 13% less economical than average car
  • 1.3 C is 9% more economical than average car
  • 1.8 GTE is 13% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 GT is 19% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1984 Audi 80 III (B2, Typ 81,85, facelift 1984) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.6 D 33 / 47 MPG
    (7.2 / 5 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% better 559—870 miles
    (900—1400 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 C 24 / 36 MPG
    (9.7 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 TD 34 / 49 MPG
    (6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% better 621—870 miles
    (1000—1400 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 CAT 23 / 44 MPG
    (10.4 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 435—808 miles
    (700—1300 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 CC 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    1.3 C 25 / 38 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% better 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 GTE 22 / 39 MPG
    (10.9 / 6.1 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 GT 25 / 38 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1984 Audi 80 III (B2, Typ 81,85, facelift 1984) MPG

    Vehicle 1.6 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 33 / 47 MPG
    (7.2 / 5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—870 miles (900—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 C
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 36 MPG
    (9.7 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 34 / 49 MPG
    (6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 44 MPG
    (10.4 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—808 miles (700—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 CC
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.3 C
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 38 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% better
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 GTE
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 39 MPG
    (10.9 / 6.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 GT
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 38 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 80 MPG

      • average 1978 Audi 80 MPG: 30 MPG / 8.4 L per 100 km
      • worst 1978 Audi 80 MPG: 18 MPG / 13 L per 100 km
      • best 1978 Audi 80 MPG: 47 MPG / 5 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1190 kg / 2624 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 33%
      • average engine power: 71 kW / 97 hp
      • difference from world average: 6% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 690 miles (1111 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    1978 Audi 80 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1978 Audi 80 MPG is between 18 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.1 — 18 to 26 MPG
  • 1.8 CL — 25 to 38 MPG
  • 1.6 TD — 33 to 47 MPG
  • 1.6 D — 31 to 44 MPG
  • 1.9 CD 5S — 24 to 34 MPG
  • 2.0 CD — 24 to 35 MPG
  • 1.8 — 25 to 38 MPG
  • 1.6 — 23 to 33 MPG
  • 1.8 GTE — 25 to 38 MPG
  • 1.3 — 27 to 46 MPG
  • 1.6 GLE — 22 to 32 MPG
  • 2.0 — 21 to 30 MPG
  • 2.2 — 20 to 29 MPG

    1978 Audi 80 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1978 Audi 80 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.8 CL — 31 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 TD — 28 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 D — 27 kg/mpg
  • 1.9 CD 5S — 37 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 CD — 37 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 — 31 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 — 36 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 GTE — 36 kg/mpg
  • 1.3 — 31 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 GLE — 36 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 — 48 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 — 50 kg/mpg

    1978 Audi 80 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1978 Audi 80 MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.

  • 2.1 is 34% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 CL is 6% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 TD is 16% more economical than average car
  • 1.6 D is 9% more economical than average car
  • 1.9 CD 5S is 16% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 CD is 13% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 is 3% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 is 19% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 GTE is 16% less economical than average car
  • 1.3 is 9% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 GLE is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 is 25% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 is 25% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1978 Audi 80 III (B2, Typ 81,85) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.1 18 / 26 MPG
    (13 / 9 L per 100 km)
    - 34% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)
    2.3 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 CL 25 / 38 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 TD 33 / 47 MPG
    (7.2 / 5 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% better 559—870 miles
    (900—1400 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 D 31 / 44 MPG
    (7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% better 559—808 miles
    (900—1300 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 CD 5S 24 / 34 MPG
    (10 / 7 L per 100 km)
    1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 CD 24 / 35 MPG
    (9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 25 / 38 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 23 / 33 MPG
    (10.4 / 7.2 L per 100 km)
    1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 435—559 miles
    (700—900 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 GTE 25 / 38 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    1.3 27 / 46 MPG
    (8.8 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 497—808 miles
    (800—1300 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 GLE 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.5 / 8 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1978 Audi 80 III (B2, Typ 81,85) MPG

    Vehicle 2.1
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 26 MPG
    (13 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 CL
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 38 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 33 / 47 MPG
    (7.2 / 5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—870 miles (900—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 44 MPG
    (7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—808 miles (900—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9 CD 5S
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 34 MPG
    (10 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 CD
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 35 MPG
    (9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 38 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 33 MPG
    (10.4 / 7.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—559 miles (700—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 GTE
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 38 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.3
    Consumption (city / highway) 27 / 46 MPG
    (8.8 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—808 miles (800—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 GLE
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.5 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 80 MPG

      • average 1976 Audi 80 MPG: 30 MPG / 9.1 L per 100 km
      • worst 1976 Audi 80 MPG: 21 MPG / 11.4 L per 100 km
      • best 1976 Audi 80 MPG: 34 MPG / 7 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 855 kg / 1885 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 31%
      • average engine power: 60 kW / 82 hp
      • difference from world average: 6% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 321 miles (517 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    1976 Audi 80 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1976 Audi 80 MPG is between 21 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.6 GLS — 21 to 30 MPG
  • 1.3 — 22 to 32 MPG
  • 1.6 GTE — 24 to 34 MPG

    1976 Audi 80 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1976 Audi 80 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.6 GLS — 35 kg/mpg
  • 1.3 — 33 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 GTE — 32 kg/mpg

    1976 Audi 80 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1976 Audi 80 MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 1.6 GLS is 25% less economical than average car
  • 1.3 is 19% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 GTE is 16% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1976 Audi 80 II (B1, Typ 82) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.6 GLS 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    1.3 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 GTE 24 / 34 MPG
    (10 / 7 L per 100 km)
    1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 311—373 miles
    (500—600 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1976 Audi 80 II (B1, Typ 82) MPG

    Vehicle 1.6 GLS
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.3
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 GTE
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 34 MPG
    (10 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—373 miles (500—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 80 MPG

      • average 1975 Audi 80 MPG: 30 MPG / 10.1 L per 100 km
      • worst 1975 Audi 80 MPG: 20 MPG / 11.8 L per 100 km
      • best 1975 Audi 80 MPG: 29 MPG / 8.2 L per 100 km
      • body type: station wagon (estate)
      • difference highway / city: 31%
      • average engine power: 63 kW / 85 hp
      • difference from world average: 6% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 272 miles (437 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    1975 Audi 80 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1975 Audi 80 MPG is 29 MPG on engine:

  • 1.6 GL — 20 to 29 MPG

    1975 Audi 80 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1975 Audi 80 MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 1.6 GL is 28% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1975 Audi 80 I Estate (B1, Typ 80) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.6 GL 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    - 28% worse 249—311 miles
    (400—500 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1975 Audi 80 I Estate (B1, Typ 80) MPG

    Vehicle 1.6 GL
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—311 miles (400—500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 80 MPG

      • average 1972 Audi 80 MPG: 29 MPG / 9.5 L per 100 km
      • worst 1972 Audi 80 MPG: 19 MPG / 12.4 L per 100 km
      • best 1972 Audi 80 MPG: 44 MPG / 5.3 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 855 kg / 1885 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 35%
      • average engine power: 66 kW / 90 hp
      • difference from world average: 9% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 509 miles (819 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    1972 Audi 80 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1972 Audi 80 MPG is between 19 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.5 — 20 to 29 MPG
  • 1.6 — 20 to 29 MPG
  • 2.0 CAT — 23 to 44 MPG
  • 1.3 — 22 to 31 MPG
  • 1.6 GL — 20 to 29 MPG
  • 1.6 GT — 19 to 27 MPG
  • 1.6 GTE — 23 to 33 MPG

    1972 Audi 80 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1972 Audi 80 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.5 — 37 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 — 37 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 CAT — 39 kg/mpg
  • 1.3 — 33 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 GL — 37 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 GT — 39 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 GTE — 33 kg/mpg

    1972 Audi 80 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1972 Audi 80 MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 1.5 is 28% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 CAT is 13% less economical than average car
  • 1.3 is 22% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 GL is 28% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 GT is 31% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 GTE is 19% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1972 Audi 80 I (B1, Typ 80) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.5 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.6 / 8.1 L per 100 km)
    0.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.6 / 8.1 L per 100 km)
    0.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 CAT 23 / 44 MPG
    (10.4 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 435—808 miles
    (700—1300 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    1.3 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 GL 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.7 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    0.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 249—311 miles
    (400—500 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 GT 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km)
    0.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 249—311 miles
    (400—500 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 GTE 23 / 33 MPG
    (10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1972 Audi 80 I (B1, Typ 80) MPG

    Vehicle 1.5
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.6 / 8.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 0.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.6 / 8.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 0.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 44 MPG
    (10.4 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—808 miles (700—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.3
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 GL
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.7 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 0.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—311 miles (400—500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 GT
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 0.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—311 miles (400—500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 GTE
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 33 MPG
    (10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person