1984 Audi 200 MPG is between 16 MPG and 28 MPG depending on engine:
The 1984 Audi 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1984 Audi 200 MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.1 Turbo |
20
/
28 MPG
(12 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 20V Turbo |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 Turbo |
18
/
26 MPG
(12.8 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 20 V Turbo |
16
/
27 MPG
(14.5 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.1 Turbo |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
28 MPG
(12 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 20V Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(12.8 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 20 V Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
27 MPG
(14.5 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
1983 Audi 200 MPG is between 17 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 1983 Audi 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1983 Audi 200 MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.1 5E |
19
/
41 MPG
(12.5 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—870 miles
(600—1400 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.1 Turbo |
17
/
33 MPG
(14.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 Turbo |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.5 / 9.5 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 20V |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.1 5E |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
41 MPG
(12.5 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—870 miles (600—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.1 Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
33 MPG
(14.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.5 / 9.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 20V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1979 Audi 200 MPG is between 18 MPG and 28 MPG depending on engine:
The 1979 Audi 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1979 Audi 200 MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.1 5E |
20
/
28 MPG
(12 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.1 5T |
18
/
26 MPG
(13 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.1 5E |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
28 MPG
(12 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.1 5T |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(13 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |