cat_logo
HomeAudi

200

Audi 200 MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Audi 200 MPG by Years

Audi 200 MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Audi 200 MPG

    • average 1984 Audi 200 MPG: 22 MPG / 10.8 L per 100 km
    • worst 1984 Audi 200 MPG: 16 MPG / 14.5 L per 100 km
    • best 1984 Audi 200 MPG: 28 MPG / 8.3 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1560 kg / 3440 lbs
    • body type: station wagon (estate)
    • difference highway / city: 33%
    • average engine power: 145 kW / 197 hp
    • difference from world average: 31% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 478 miles (769 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

1984 Audi 200 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

1984 Audi 200 MPG is between 16 MPG and 28 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.1 Turbo — 20 to 28 MPG
  • 2.2 20V Turbo — 19 to 27 MPG
  • 2.2 Turbo — 18 to 26 MPG
  • 2.2 20 V Turbo — 16 to 27 MPG


    1984 Audi 200 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1984 Audi 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.1 Turbo — 63 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 20V Turbo — 71 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 Turbo — 69 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 20 V Turbo — 71 kg/mpg


    1984 Audi 200 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1984 Audi 200 MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.1 Turbo is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 20V Turbo is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 Turbo is 34% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 20 V Turbo is 31% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1984 Audi 200 Avant (C3, Typ 44,44Q) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.1 Turbo 20 / 28 MPG
    (12 / 8.3 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 20V Turbo 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 Turbo 18 / 26 MPG
    (12.8 / 8.9 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 20 V Turbo 16 / 27 MPG
    (14.5 / 8.6 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1984 Audi 200 Avant (C3, Typ 44,44Q) MPG

    Vehicle 2.1 Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 28 MPG
    (12 / 8.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 20V Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 26 MPG
    (12.8 / 8.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 20 V Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 27 MPG
    (14.5 / 8.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 200 MPG

      • average 1983 Audi 200 MPG: 24 MPG / 10.3 L per 100 km
      • worst 1983 Audi 200 MPG: 17 MPG / 14.2 L per 100 km
      • best 1983 Audi 200 MPG: 41 MPG / 5.8 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1520 kg / 3352 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 44%
      • average engine power: 136 kW / 185 hp
      • difference from world average: 25% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 523 miles (842 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1983 Audi 200 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1983 Audi 200 MPG is between 17 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.1 5E — 19 to 41 MPG
  • 2.1 Turbo — 17 to 33 MPG
  • 2.2 Turbo — 17 to 25 MPG
  • 2.2 20V — 19 to 28 MPG


    1983 Audi 200 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1983 Audi 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.1 5E — 50 kg/mpg
  • 2.1 Turbo — 61 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 Turbo — 59 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 20V — 69 kg/mpg


    1983 Audi 200 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1983 Audi 200 MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.1 5E is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.1 Turbo is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 Turbo is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 20V is 31% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1983 Audi 200 (C3, Typ 44,44Q) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.1 5E 19 / 41 MPG
    (12.5 / 5.8 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 373—870 miles
    (600—1400 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.1 Turbo 17 / 33 MPG
    (14.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		2 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 Turbo 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.5 / 9.5 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 20V 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1983 Audi 200 (C3, Typ 44,44Q) MPG

    Vehicle 2.1 5E
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 41 MPG
    (12.5 / 5.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—870 miles (600—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.1 Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 33 MPG
    (14.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.5 / 9.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 20V
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 200 MPG

      • average 1979 Audi 200 MPG: 23 MPG / 10.7 L per 100 km
      • worst 1979 Audi 200 MPG: 18 MPG / 13 L per 100 km
      • best 1979 Audi 200 MPG: 28 MPG / 8.3 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1325 kg / 2922 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 30%
      • average engine power: 113 kW / 153 hp
      • difference from world average: 28% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 448 miles (721 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1979 Audi 200 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1979 Audi 200 MPG is between 18 MPG and 28 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.1 5E — 20 to 28 MPG
  • 2.1 5T — 18 to 26 MPG


    1979 Audi 200 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1979 Audi 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.1 5E — 55 kg/mpg
  • 2.1 5T — 63 kg/mpg


    1979 Audi 200 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1979 Audi 200 MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.1 5E is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.1 5T is 34% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1979 Audi 200 (C2, Typ 43) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.1 5E 20 / 28 MPG
    (12 / 8.3 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.1 5T 18 / 26 MPG
    (13 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1979 Audi 200 (C2, Typ 43) MPG

    Vehicle 2.1 5E
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 28 MPG
    (12 / 8.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.1 5T
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 26 MPG
    (13 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings