Audi 100 MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Audi 100 MPG by Years

Quick Notes on Audi 100 MPG

    • average 1990 Audi 100 MPG: 27 MPG / 9.4 L per 100 km
    • worst 1990 Audi 100 MPG: 16 MPG / 14.6 L per 100 km
    • best 1990 Audi 100 MPG: 49 MPG / 4.8 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1435 kg / 3164 lbs
    • body type: station wagon (estate)
    • difference highway / city: 41%
    • average engine power: 104 kW / 141 hp
    • difference from world average: 16% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 742 miles (1194 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

1990 Audi 100 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

1990 Audi 100 MPG is between 16 MPG and 49 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.0 16V — 21 to 35 MPG
  • 2.6 V6 — 17 to 24 MPG
  • 2.8 V6 E — 17 to 29 MPG
  • 2.8 E — 17 to 30 MPG
  • 2.3 E — 19 to 32 MPG
  • 2.5 TDI — 31 to 49 MPG
  • 2.0 E — 20 to 32 MPG
  • 2.2 S4 Turbo — 16 to 29 MPG
  • 2.0 — 22 to 36 MPG
  • 2.4 D — 24 to 43 MPG

    1990 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1990 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.0 16V — 46 kg/mpg
  • 2.6 V6 — 82 kg/mpg
  • 2.8 V6 E — 65 kg/mpg
  • 2.8 E — 56 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 E — 61 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 TDI — 42 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 E — 53 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 S4 Turbo — 69 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 — 47 kg/mpg
  • 2.4 D — 46 kg/mpg

    1990 Audi 100 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1990 Audi 100 MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.

  • 2.0 16V is 6% less economical than average car
  • 2.6 V6 is 41% less economical than average car
  • 2.8 V6 E is 25% less economical than average car
  • 2.8 E is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 E is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 TDI is 9% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 E is 13% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 S4 Turbo is 25% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 is 9% less economical than average car
  • 2.4 D is 3% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1990 Audi 100 Avant (4A,C4) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.0 16V 21 / 35 MPG
    (11.1 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% worse 435—746 miles
    (700—1200 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.6 V6 17 / 24 MPG
    (14 / 9.8 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)
    2.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.8 V6 E 17 / 29 MPG
    (13.5 / 8 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 373—621 miles
    (600—1000 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    2.8 E 17 / 30 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—621 miles
    (600—1000 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 E 19 / 32 MPG
    (12.7 / 7.3 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 TDI 31 / 49 MPG
    (7.5 / 4.8 L per 100 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% better 684—1056 miles
    (1100—1700 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 E 20 / 32 MPG
    (11.9 / 7.3 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 S4 Turbo 16 / 29 MPG
    (14.6 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 22 / 36 MPG
    (10.7 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 435—746 miles
    (700—1200 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.4 D 24 / 43 MPG
    (9.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 497—932 miles
    (800—1500 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1990 Audi 100 Avant (4A,C4) MPG

    Vehicle 2.0 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 35 MPG
    (11.1 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—746 miles (700—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.6 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 24 MPG
    (14 / 9.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.8 V6 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 29 MPG
    (13.5 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—621 miles (600—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.8 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 30 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—621 miles (600—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 32 MPG
    (12.7 / 7.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5 TDI
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 49 MPG
    (7.5 / 4.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% better
    Driving range (full tank) 684—1056 miles (1100—1700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 32 MPG
    (11.9 / 7.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 S4 Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 29 MPG
    (14.6 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 36 MPG
    (10.7 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—746 miles (700—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.4 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 43 MPG
    (9.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—932 miles (800—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 100 MPG

      • average 1990 Audi 100 MPG: 29 MPG / 8.6 L per 100 km
      • worst 1990 Audi 100 MPG: 19 MPG / 12.7 L per 100 km
      • best 1990 Audi 100 MPG: 53 MPG / 4.4 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1385 kg / 3054 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 40%
      • average engine power: 93 kW / 126 hp
      • difference from world average: 9% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 815 miles (1311 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    1990 Audi 100 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1990 Audi 100 MPG is between 19 MPG and 53 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.8 V6 E — 19 to 34 MPG
  • 2.6 V6 — 19 to 34 MPG
  • 2.5 TDI — 31 to 53 MPG
  • 2.3 E — 19 to 32 MPG
  • 2.0 — 22 to 37 MPG
  • 2.0 E — 20 to 32 MPG
  • 2.0 E 16V — 22 to 31 MPG
  • 2.4 D — 24 to 44 MPG

    1990 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1990 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.8 V6 E — 52 kg/mpg
  • 2.6 V6 — 52 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 TDI — 37 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 E — 59 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 — 44 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 E — 51 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 E 16V — 55 kg/mpg
  • 2.4 D — 42 kg/mpg

    1990 Audi 100 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1990 Audi 100 MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.

  • 2.8 V6 E is 16% less economical than average car
  • 2.6 V6 is 16% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 TDI is 22% more economical than average car
  • 2.3 E is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 is 6% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 E is 13% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 E 16V is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.4 D is 3% more economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1990 Audi 100 (4A,C4) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.8 V6 E 19 / 34 MPG
    (12.5 / 7 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.6 V6 19 / 34 MPG
    (12.5 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 373—746 miles
    (600—1200 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 TDI 31 / 53 MPG
    (7.5 / 4.4 L per 100 km)
    2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% better 684—1118 miles
    (1100—1800 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 E 19 / 32 MPG
    (12.7 / 7.3 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 22 / 37 MPG
    (10.7 / 6.4 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% worse 435—808 miles
    (700—1300 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 E 20 / 32 MPG
    (11.9 / 7.3 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 E 16V 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.4 D 24 / 44 MPG
    (9.9 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% better 497—932 miles
    (800—1500 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1990 Audi 100 (4A,C4) MPG

    Vehicle 2.8 V6 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 34 MPG
    (12.5 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.6 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 34 MPG
    (12.5 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—746 miles (600—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5 TDI
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 53 MPG
    (7.5 / 4.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% better
    Driving range (full tank) 684—1118 miles (1100—1800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 32 MPG
    (12.7 / 7.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 37 MPG
    (10.7 / 6.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—808 miles (700—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 32 MPG
    (11.9 / 7.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 E 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.4 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 44 MPG
    (9.9 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—932 miles (800—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 100 MPG

      • average 1988 Audi 100 MPG: 29 MPG / 8.6 L per 100 km
      • worst 1988 Audi 100 MPG: 18 MPG / 13.3 L per 100 km
      • best 1988 Audi 100 MPG: 44 MPG / 5.3 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1360 kg / 2999 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 29%
      • average engine power: 88 kW / 120 hp
      • difference from world average: 9% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 828 miles (1333 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    1988 Audi 100 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1988 Audi 100 MPG is between 18 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.8 — 18 to 25 MPG
  • 2.2 Turbo CAT — 19 to 26 MPG
  • 2.2 Turbo — 21 to 30 MPG
  • 2.3 E CAT — 23 to 33 MPG
  • 2.0 D — 31 to 44 MPG
  • 2.0 D Turbo — 31 to 44 MPG
  • 2.0 E — 23 to 34 MPG
  • 1.8 CAT — 22 to 32 MPG
  • 2.0 E CAT — 23 to 33 MPG
  • 2.2 E — 23 to 34 MPG
  • 2.2 CAT — 21 to 31 MPG
  • 2.3 E — 22 to 32 MPG
  • 2.4 D — 29 to 41 MPG
  • 2.5 TDI — 33 to 44 MPG
  • 2.3 — 22 to 32 MPG

    1988 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1988 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.8 — 64 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 Turbo CAT — 64 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 Turbo — 54 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 E CAT — 48 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 D — 36 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 D Turbo — 37 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 E — 46 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 CAT — 49 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 E CAT — 48 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 E — 46 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 CAT — 54 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 E — 52 kg/mpg
  • 2.4 D — 39 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 TDI — 34 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 — 52 kg/mpg

    1988 Audi 100 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1988 Audi 100 MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.

  • 1.8 is 37% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 Turbo CAT is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 Turbo is 25% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 E CAT is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 D is 9% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 D Turbo is 9% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 E is 16% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 CAT is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 E CAT is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 E is 16% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 CAT is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 E is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.4 D is 3% more economical than average car
  • 2.5 TDI is 22% more economical than average car
  • 2.3 is 19% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1988 Audi 100 (C3, Typ 44,44Q, facelift 1988) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.8 18 / 25 MPG
    (13.3 / 9.3 L per 100 km)
    1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    2.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 Turbo CAT 19 / 26 MPG
    (12.5 / 8.9 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 Turbo 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 E CAT 23 / 33 MPG
    (10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 D 31 / 44 MPG
    (7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% better 621—932 miles
    (1000—1500 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 D Turbo 31 / 44 MPG
    (7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% better 621—932 miles
    (1000—1500 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 E 23 / 34 MPG
    (10.1 / 7 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 CAT 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.5 / 7.3 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 E CAT 23 / 33 MPG
    (10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 E 23 / 34 MPG
    (10.1 / 7 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 CAT 21 / 31 MPG
    (11 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 E 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.4 D 29 / 41 MPG
    (8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% better 621—870 miles
    (1000—1400 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 TDI 33 / 44 MPG
    (7.2 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% better 684—932 miles
    (1100—1500 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1988 Audi 100 (C3, Typ 44,44Q, facelift 1988) MPG

    Vehicle 1.8
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 25 MPG
    (13.3 / 9.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 Turbo CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 26 MPG
    (12.5 / 8.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 E CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 33 MPG
    (10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 44 MPG
    (7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 D Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 44 MPG
    (7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 34 MPG
    (10.1 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.5 / 7.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 E CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 33 MPG
    (10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 34 MPG
    (10.1 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 31 MPG
    (11 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.4 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 29 / 41 MPG
    (8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5 TDI
    Consumption (city / highway) 33 / 44 MPG
    (7.2 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% better
    Driving range (full tank) 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 100 MPG

      • average 1988 Audi 100 MPG: 27 MPG / 9.4 L per 100 km
      • worst 1988 Audi 100 MPG: 17 MPG / 13.5 L per 100 km
      • best 1988 Audi 100 MPG: 44 MPG / 5.4 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1360 kg / 2999 lbs
      • body type: station wagon (estate)
      • difference highway / city: 31%
      • average engine power: 84 kW / 115 hp
      • difference from world average: 16% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 742 miles (1194 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1988 Audi 100 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1988 Audi 100 MPG is between 17 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.3 CAT — 19 to 28 MPG
  • 2.0 TD — 26 to 38 MPG
  • 2.0 E CAT — 21 to 30 MPG
  • 2.0 D — 31 to 44 MPG
  • 2.3 — 18 to 26 MPG
  • 2.2 Turbo CAT — 18 to 26 MPG
  • 1.8 — 17 to 25 MPG
  • 1.8 CAT — 22 to 31 MPG
  • 2.2 CAT — 23 to 34 MPG
  • 2.2 — 21 to 31 MPG
  • 2.4 D — 24 to 34 MPG
  • 2.5 TDI — 25 to 36 MPG

    1988 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1988 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.3 CAT — 59 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 TD — 45 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 E CAT — 54 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 D — 37 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 — 67 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 Turbo CAT — 69 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 — 66 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 CAT — 52 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 CAT — 48 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 — 56 kg/mpg
  • 2.4 D — 50 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 TDI — 47 kg/mpg

    1988 Audi 100 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1988 Audi 100 MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.

  • 2.3 CAT is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 TD is 6% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 E CAT is 25% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 D is 9% more economical than average car
  • 2.3 is 34% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 Turbo CAT is 34% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 is 37% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 CAT is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 CAT is 16% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.4 D is 16% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 TDI is 9% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1988 Audi 100 Avant (C3, Typ 44, 44Q, facelift 1988) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.3 CAT 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 435—559 miles
    (700—900 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 TD 26 / 38 MPG
    (9 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% worse 559—808 miles
    (900—1300 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 E CAT 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 D 31 / 44 MPG
    (7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% better 621—932 miles
    (1000—1500 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 18 / 26 MPG
    (13.1 / 9.1 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    2.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 Turbo CAT 18 / 26 MPG
    (13.1 / 9.1 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    2.3 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.5 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    2.3 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 CAT 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 CAT 23 / 34 MPG
    (10.1 / 7 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 21 / 31 MPG
    (11 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.4 D 24 / 34 MPG
    (9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 497—746 miles
    (800—1200 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 TDI 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 559—746 miles
    (900—1200 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1988 Audi 100 Avant (C3, Typ 44, 44Q, facelift 1988) MPG

    Vehicle 2.3 CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—559 miles (700—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 38 MPG
    (9 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 559—808 miles (900—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 E CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 44 MPG
    (7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 26 MPG
    (13.1 / 9.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 Turbo CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 26 MPG
    (13.1 / 9.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.5 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 34 MPG
    (10.1 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 31 MPG
    (11 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.4 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 34 MPG
    (9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—746 miles (800—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5 TDI
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 559—746 miles (900—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 100 MPG

      • average 1982 Audi 100 MPG: 28 MPG / 8.9 L per 100 km
      • worst 1982 Audi 100 MPG: 19 MPG / 12.5 L per 100 km
      • best 1982 Audi 100 MPG: 44 MPG / 5.4 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1330 kg / 2933 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 35%
      • average engine power: 89 kW / 121 hp
      • difference from world average: 13% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 710 miles (1143 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1982 Audi 100 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1982 Audi 100 MPG is between 19 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.2 E Turbo — 19 to 26 MPG
  • 2.3 E — 21 to 35 MPG
  • 1.8 — 25 to 36 MPG
  • 2.0 — 21 to 35 MPG
  • 1.9 — 22 to 44 MPG
  • 2.0 D — 29 to 42 MPG
  • 2.0 D Turbo — 28 to 41 MPG
  • 2.1 — 19 to 41 MPG
  • 2.2 CAT — 21 to 30 MPG
  • 2.2 E — 19 to 28 MPG
  • 2.2 — 22 to 31 MPG
  • 2.2 Turbo — 21 to 30 MPG
  • 2.3 — 22 to 32 MPG

    1982 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1982 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.2 E Turbo — 64 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 E — 48 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 — 41 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 — 42 kg/mpg
  • 1.9 — 39 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 D — 36 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 D Turbo — 38 kg/mpg
  • 2.1 — 47 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 CAT — 52 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 E — 60 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 — 53 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 Turbo — 54 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 — 51 kg/mpg

    1982 Audi 100 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1982 Audi 100 MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.

  • 2.2 E Turbo is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 E is 19% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 is 9% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 is 19% less economical than average car
  • 1.9 is 9% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 D is 6% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 D Turbo is 3% more economical than average car
  • 2.1 is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 CAT is 25% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 E is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 Turbo is 25% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 is 19% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1982 Audi 100 (C3, Typ 44,44Q) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.2 E Turbo 19 / 26 MPG
    (12.5 / 8.9 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 E 21 / 35 MPG
    (11.4 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 435—746 miles
    (700—1200 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 559—746 miles
    (900—1200 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 21 / 35 MPG
    (11.4 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 435—746 miles
    (700—1200 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 22 / 44 MPG
    (10.9 / 5.4 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 435—932 miles
    (700—1500 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 D 29 / 42 MPG
    (8.1 / 5.6 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% better 621—870 miles
    (1000—1400 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 D Turbo 28 / 41 MPG
    (8.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% better 621—870 miles
    (1000—1400 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.1 19 / 41 MPG
    (12.5 / 5.7 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—870 miles
    (600—1400 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 CAT 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 E 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 435—559 miles
    (700—900 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 Turbo 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1982 Audi 100 (C3, Typ 44,44Q) MPG

    Vehicle 2.2 E Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 26 MPG
    (12.5 / 8.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 35 MPG
    (11.4 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—746 miles (700—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 559—746 miles (900—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 35 MPG
    (11.4 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—746 miles (700—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 44 MPG
    (10.9 / 5.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—932 miles (700—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 29 / 42 MPG
    (8.1 / 5.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 D Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 28 / 41 MPG
    (8.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.1
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 41 MPG
    (12.5 / 5.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—870 miles (600—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—559 miles (700—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 100 MPG

      • average 1982 Audi 100 MPG: 27 MPG / 9.1 L per 100 km
      • worst 1982 Audi 100 MPG: 19 MPG / 12.5 L per 100 km
      • best 1982 Audi 100 MPG: 42 MPG / 5.6 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1370 kg / 3021 lbs
      • body type: station wagon (estate)
      • difference highway / city: 33%
      • average engine power: 90 kW / 122 hp
      • difference from world average: 16% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 710 miles (1143 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1982 Audi 100 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1982 Audi 100 MPG is between 19 MPG and 42 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.8 — 25 to 36 MPG
  • 1.8 CAT — 23 to 33 MPG
  • 1.9 — 20 to 29 MPG
  • 2.0 CAT — 21 to 31 MPG
  • 2.0 E — 23 to 33 MPG
  • 2.0 TD — 29 to 42 MPG
  • 2.1 — 19 to 41 MPG
  • 2.2 — 22 to 31 MPG
  • 2.2 E — 22 to 31 MPG
  • 2.2 Turbo — 19 to 27 MPG
  • 2.2 Turbo CAT — 21 to 30 MPG
  • 2.3 — 23 to 33 MPG
  • 2.3 E — 22 to 32 MPG

    1982 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1982 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.8 — 43 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 CAT — 48 kg/mpg
  • 1.9 — 52 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 CAT — 52 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 E — 50 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 TD — 38 kg/mpg
  • 2.1 — 57 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 — 55 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 E — 45 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 Turbo — 66 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 Turbo CAT — 47 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 — 50 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 E — 53 kg/mpg

    1982 Audi 100 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1982 Audi 100 MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.

  • 1.8 is 9% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 CAT is 19% less economical than average car
  • 1.9 is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 CAT is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 E is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 TD is 6% more economical than average car
  • 2.1 is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 E is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 Turbo is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 Turbo CAT is 25% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 E is 19% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1982 Audi 100 Avant (C3, Typ 44, 44Q) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.8 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 559—746 miles
    (900—1200 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 CAT 23 / 33 MPG
    (10.4 / 7.2 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 CAT 21 / 31 MPG
    (11 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 E 23 / 33 MPG
    (10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 TD 29 / 42 MPG
    (8.1 / 5.6 L per 100 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% better 621—870 miles
    (1000—1400 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.1 19 / 41 MPG
    (12.5 / 5.7 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 373—870 miles
    (600—1400 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 E 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 Turbo 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 Turbo CAT 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 23 / 33 MPG
    (10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 E 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1982 Audi 100 Avant (C3, Typ 44, 44Q) MPG

    Vehicle 1.8
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 559—746 miles (900—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 33 MPG
    (10.4 / 7.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 31 MPG
    (11 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 33 MPG
    (10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 29 / 42 MPG
    (8.1 / 5.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.1
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 41 MPG
    (12.5 / 5.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—870 miles (600—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 Turbo CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 33 MPG
    (10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 E
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 100 MPG

      • average 1979 Audi 100 MPG: 27 MPG / 9 L per 100 km
      • worst 1979 Audi 100 MPG: 19 MPG / 12.1 L per 100 km
      • best 1979 Audi 100 MPG: 40 MPG / 5.9 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1210 kg / 2668 lbs
      • body type: station wagon (estate)
      • difference highway / city: 31%
      • average engine power: 72 kW / 98 hp
      • difference from world average: 16% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 504 miles (811 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1979 Audi 100 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1979 Audi 100 MPG is between 19 MPG and 40 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.9 — 22 to 32 MPG
  • 2.1 L — 19 to 28 MPG
  • 1.6 L — 22 to 31 MPG
  • 2.0 D — 28 to 40 MPG

    1979 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1979 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.9 — 45 kg/mpg
  • 2.1 L — 55 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 L — 44 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 D — 38 kg/mpg

    1979 Audi 100 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1979 Audi 100 MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 1.9 is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.1 L is 31% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 L is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 D is 0% more economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1979 Audi 100 Avant (C2, Typ 43, facelift 1979) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.9 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.1 L 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 L 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 D 28 / 40 MPG
    (8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 0% 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1979 Audi 100 Avant (C2, Typ 43, facelift 1979) MPG

    Vehicle 1.9
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.1 L
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 L
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 28 / 40 MPG
    (8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 0% better
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 100 MPG

      • average 1979 Audi 100 MPG: 27 MPG / 8.8 L per 100 km
      • worst 1979 Audi 100 MPG: 21 MPG / 11.3 L per 100 km
      • best 1979 Audi 100 MPG: 40 MPG / 5.9 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1170 kg / 2580 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 30%
      • average engine power: 72 kW / 98 hp
      • difference from world average: 16% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 504 miles (811 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1979 Audi 100 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1979 Audi 100 MPG is between 21 MPG and 40 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.1 L — 21 to 30 MPG
  • 1.6 L — 22 to 31 MPG
  • 2.0 D — 28 to 40 MPG
  • 1.9 — 22 to 32 MPG

    1979 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1979 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.1 L — 50 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 L — 44 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 D — 38 kg/mpg
  • 1.9 — 45 kg/mpg

    1979 Audi 100 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1979 Audi 100 MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.1 L is 25% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 L is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 D is 0% more economical than average car
  • 1.9 is 19% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1979 Audi 100 (C2, Typ 43, facelift 1979) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.1 L 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 L 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 D 28 / 40 MPG
    (8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 0% 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1979 Audi 100 (C2, Typ 43, facelift 1979) MPG

    Vehicle 2.1 L
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 L
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 28 / 40 MPG
    (8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 0% better
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 100 MPG

      • average 1977 Audi 100 MPG: 27 MPG / 10 L per 100 km
      • worst 1977 Audi 100 MPG: 17 MPG / 13.7 L per 100 km
      • best 1977 Audi 100 MPG: 37 MPG / 6.3 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1150 kg / 2536 lbs
      • body type: station wagon (estate)
      • difference highway / city: 30%
      • average engine power: 71 kW / 96 hp
      • difference from world average: 16% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 472 miles (759 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1977 Audi 100 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1977 Audi 100 MPG is between 17 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.6 L — 21 to 31 MPG
  • 2.0 D — 26 to 37 MPG
  • 2.1 L — 18 to 26 MPG
  • 2.0 LS — 17 to 25 MPG

    1977 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1977 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.6 L — 44 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 D — 40 kg/mpg
  • 2.1 L — 56 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 LS — 58 kg/mpg

    1977 Audi 100 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1977 Audi 100 MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 1.6 L is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 D is 6% less economical than average car
  • 2.1 L is 34% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 LS is 37% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1977 Audi 100 Avant (C2, Typ 43) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.6 L 21 / 31 MPG
    (11 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 D 26 / 37 MPG
    (9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.1 L 18 / 26 MPG
    (13 / 9 L per 100 km)
    1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    2.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 LS 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.7 / 9.5 L per 100 km)
    1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)
    2.4 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1977 Audi 100 Avant (C2, Typ 43) MPG

    Vehicle 1.6 L
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 31 MPG
    (11 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 37 MPG
    (9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.1 L
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 26 MPG
    (13 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 LS
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.7 / 9.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 100 MPG

      • average 1976 Audi 100 MPG: 26 MPG / 10 L per 100 km
      • worst 1976 Audi 100 MPG: 17 MPG / 13.7 L per 100 km
      • best 1976 Audi 100 MPG: 37 MPG / 6.3 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1170 kg / 2580 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 30%
      • average engine power: 71 kW / 96 hp
      • difference from world average: 19% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 472 miles (759 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1976 Audi 100 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1976 Audi 100 MPG is between 17 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.6 L — 21 to 31 MPG
  • 2.0 D — 26 to 37 MPG
  • 2.0 LS — 17 to 25 MPG
  • 2.1 L — 18 to 26 MPG

    1976 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1976 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.6 L — 44 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 D — 40 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 LS — 58 kg/mpg
  • 2.1 L — 56 kg/mpg

    1976 Audi 100 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1976 Audi 100 MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 1.6 L is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 D is 6% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 LS is 37% less economical than average car
  • 2.1 L is 34% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1976 Audi 100 (C2, Typ 43) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.6 L 21 / 31 MPG
    (11 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 D 26 / 37 MPG
    (9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 LS 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.7 / 9.5 L per 100 km)
    1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)
    2.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.1 L 18 / 26 MPG
    (13 / 9 L per 100 km)
    1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    2.3 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1976 Audi 100 (C2, Typ 43) MPG

    Vehicle 1.6 L
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 31 MPG
    (11 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 37 MPG
    (9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 LS
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 25 MPG
    (13.7 / 9.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.1 L
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 26 MPG
    (13 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 100 MPG

      • average 1974 Audi 100 MPG: 26 MPG / 10.6 L per 100 km
      • worst 1974 Audi 100 MPG: 18 MPG / 13 L per 100 km
      • best 1974 Audi 100 MPG: 29 MPG / 8.2 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1075 kg / 2370 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 29%
      • average engine power: 71 kW / 96 hp
      • difference from world average: 19% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 354 miles (569 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1974 Audi 100 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1974 Audi 100 MPG is between 18 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.8 — 19 to 27 MPG
  • 1.8 LS — 19 to 27 MPG
  • 1.9 GL — 18 to 26 MPG
  • 1.6 — 20 to 29 MPG

    1974 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1974 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.8 — 48 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 LS — 50 kg/mpg
  • 1.9 GL — 52 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 — 47 kg/mpg

    1974 Audi 100 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1974 Audi 100 MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 1.8 is 31% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 LS is 31% less economical than average car
  • 1.9 GL is 34% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 is 28% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1974 Audi 100 (C1, facelift 1973) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.8 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km)
    1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 LS 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.3 / 8.6 L per 100 km)
    1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 GL 18 / 26 MPG
    (13 / 9 L per 100 km)
    1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)
    2.3 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.7 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse -
    2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1974 Audi 100 (C1, facelift 1973) MPG

    Vehicle 1.8
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 LS
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.3 / 8.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9 GL
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 26 MPG
    (13 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.7 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) -
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 100 MPG

      • average 1970 Audi 100 MPG: 26 MPG / 11.3 L per 100 km
      • worst 1970 Audi 100 MPG: 18 MPG / 13.2 L per 100 km
      • best 1970 Audi 100 MPG: 26 MPG / 9.2 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1100 kg / 2426 lbs
      • body type: coupe
      • difference highway / city: 31%
      • average engine power: 85 kW / 116 hp
      • difference from world average: 19% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 313 miles (504 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1970 Audi 100 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1970 Audi 100 MPG is 26 MPG on engine:

  • 1.9 — 18 to 26 MPG

    1970 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1970 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.9 — 55 kg/mpg

    1970 Audi 100 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1970 Audi 100 MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 1.9 is 37% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1970 Audi 100 Coupe S MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.9 18 / 26 MPG
    (13.2 / 9.2 L per 100 km)
    1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)
    2.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1970 Audi 100 Coupe S MPG

    Vehicle 1.9
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 26 MPG
    (13.2 / 9.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.9 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Audi 100 MPG

      • average 1968 Audi 100 MPG: 26 MPG / 10.5 L per 100 km
      • worst 1968 Audi 100 MPG: 19 MPG / 12.7 L per 100 km
      • best 1968 Audi 100 MPG: 28 MPG / 8.5 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1100 kg / 2426 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 32%
      • average engine power: 75 kW / 103 hp
      • difference from world average: 19% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 340 miles (547 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1968 Audi 100 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1968 Audi 100 MPG is between 19 MPG and 28 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.9 LS — 19 to 28 MPG
  • 1.8 LS — 19 to 27 MPG
  • 1.8 — 19 to 28 MPG
  • 1.9 GL — 19 to 28 MPG

    1968 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1968 Audi 100 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.8 LS — 51 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 — 48 kg/mpg
  • 1.9 GL — 50 kg/mpg

    1968 Audi 100 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1968 Audi 100 MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 1.9 LS is 31% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 LS is 34% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 is 31% less economical than average car
  • 1.9 GL is 31% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1968 Audi 100 (C1) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.9 LS 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    - 31% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 LS 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.7 / 8.8 L per 100 km)
    1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 GL 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1968 Audi 100 (C1) MPG

    Vehicle 1.9 LS
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 LS
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.7 / 8.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9 GL
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person