Alfa Romeo 75 MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Alfa Romeo 75 MPG by Years

Alfa Romeo 75 MPG - Choose Generation

Quick Notes on Alfa Romeo 75 MPG

    • average 1988 Alfa Romeo 75 MPG: 28 MPG / 8.9 L per 100 km
    • worst 1988 Alfa Romeo 75 MPG: 17 MPG / 13.5 L per 100 km
    • best 1988 Alfa Romeo 75 MPG: 43 MPG / 5.5 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1260 kg / 2778 lbs
    • body type: sedan
    • difference highway / city: 40%
    • average engine power: 102 kW / 139 hp
    • difference from world average: 13% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 579 miles (932 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

1988 Alfa Romeo 75 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

1988 Alfa Romeo 75 MPG is between 17 MPG and 43 MPG depending on engine:

  • America 1.8 Turbo — 24 to 34 MPG
  • 1.8 i.e. — 22 to 34 MPG
  • America 3.0 V6 — 18 to 32 MPG
  • 1.6 — 20 to 34 MPG
  • 1.6 i.e. — 20 to 34 MPG
  • Quadrifoglio Verde 1.8 — 24 to 34 MPG
  • Quadrifoglio Verde 3.0 V6 — 18 to 31 MPG
  • 1.8 — 19 to 34 MPG
  • 2.0 TD — 26 to 43 MPG
  • 2.0 Twin Spark — 24 to 39 MPG
  • Quadrifoglio Verde 2.5 V6 — 17 to 32 MPG
  • 2.4 TD — 26 to 43 MPG

    1988 Alfa Romeo 75 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1988 Alfa Romeo 75 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • America 1.8 Turbo — 46 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 i.e. — 41 kg/mpg
  • America 3.0 V6 — 54 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 — 44 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 i.e. — 44 kg/mpg
  • Quadrifoglio Verde 1.8 — 46 kg/mpg
  • Quadrifoglio Verde 3.0 V6 — 57 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 — 44 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 TD — 39 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 Twin Spark — 40 kg/mpg
  • Quadrifoglio Verde 2.5 V6 — 51 kg/mpg
  • 2.4 TD — 39 kg/mpg

    1988 Alfa Romeo 75 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1988 Alfa Romeo 75 MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.

  • America 1.8 Turbo is 16% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 i.e. is 16% less economical than average car
  • America 3.0 V6 is 25% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 is 22% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 i.e. is 22% less economical than average car
  • Quadrifoglio Verde 1.8 is 16% less economical than average car
  • Quadrifoglio Verde 3.0 V6 is 28% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 TD is 3% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 Twin Spark is 9% less economical than average car
  • Quadrifoglio Verde 2.5 V6 is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.4 TD is 0% more economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1988 Alfa Romeo 75 (162 B, facelift 1988) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    America 1.8 Turbo 24 / 34 MPG
    (9.7 / 7 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 i.e. 22 / 34 MPG
    (10.5 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    America 3.0 V6 18 / 32 MPG
    (12.9 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 20 / 34 MPG
    (11.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 i.e. 20 / 34 MPG
    (11.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Quadrifoglio Verde 1.8 24 / 34 MPG
    (9.7 / 7 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Quadrifoglio Verde 3.0 V6 18 / 31 MPG
    (13.2 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 19 / 34 MPG
    (12.2 / 7 L per 100 km)
    1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 TD 26 / 43 MPG
    (9 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 Twin Spark 24 / 39 MPG
    (9.9 / 6 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Quadrifoglio Verde 2.5 V6 17 / 32 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    2.4 TD 26 / 43 MPG
    (8.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 0% 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1988 Alfa Romeo 75 (162 B, facelift 1988) MPG

    Vehicle America 1.8 Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 34 MPG
    (9.7 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 i.e.
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 34 MPG
    (10.5 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle America 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 32 MPG
    (12.9 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 34 MPG
    (11.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 i.e.
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 34 MPG
    (11.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle Quadrifoglio Verde 1.8
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 34 MPG
    (9.7 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle Quadrifoglio Verde 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 31 MPG
    (13.2 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 34 MPG
    (12.2 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 43 MPG
    (9 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 Twin Spark
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 39 MPG
    (9.9 / 6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle Quadrifoglio Verde 2.5 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 32 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.4 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 43 MPG
    (8.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 0% better
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Alfa Romeo 75 MPG

      • average 1985 Alfa Romeo 75 MPG: 27 MPG / 8.9 L per 100 km
      • worst 1985 Alfa Romeo 75 MPG: 18 MPG / 13 L per 100 km
      • best 1985 Alfa Romeo 75 MPG: 43 MPG / 5.5 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1250 kg / 2756 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 37%
      • average engine power: 103 kW / 139 hp
      • difference from world average: 16% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 564 miles (907 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1985 Alfa Romeo 75 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1985 Alfa Romeo 75 MPG is between 18 MPG and 43 MPG depending on engine:

  • Quadrifoglio Verde 2.5 V6 — 18 to 35 MPG
  • 1.6 — 20 to 34 MPG
  • America 1.8 Turbo — 24 to 34 MPG
  • 1.8 — 19 to 34 MPG
  • 1.8 Turbo i.e. — 24 to 34 MPG
  • 2.0 — 24 to 28 MPG
  • 2.0 TD — 26 to 43 MPG
  • 2.0 Twin Spark — 24 to 39 MPG
  • America 3.0 V6 — 18 to 32 MPG

    1985 Alfa Romeo 75 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1985 Alfa Romeo 75 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • Quadrifoglio Verde 2.5 V6 — 46 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 — 42 kg/mpg
  • America 1.8 Turbo — 46 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 — 42 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 Turbo i.e. — 42 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 — 41 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 TD — 38 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 Twin Spark — 39 kg/mpg
  • America 3.0 V6 — 52 kg/mpg

    1985 Alfa Romeo 75 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1985 Alfa Romeo 75 MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.

  • Quadrifoglio Verde 2.5 V6 is 22% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 is 22% less economical than average car
  • America 1.8 Turbo is 16% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 is 22% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 Turbo i.e. is 16% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 TD is 3% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 Twin Spark is 9% less economical than average car
  • America 3.0 V6 is 25% less economical than average car
  • Additional Details On 1985 Alfa Romeo 75 (162 B) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    Quadrifoglio Verde 2.5 V6 18 / 35 MPG
    (13 / 6.8 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 20 / 34 MPG
    (11.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    America 1.8 Turbo 24 / 34 MPG
    (9.7 / 7 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 19 / 34 MPG
    (12.2 / 7 L per 100 km)
    1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 Turbo i.e. 24 / 34 MPG
    (9.7 / 7 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 24 / 28 MPG
    (9.9 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 311—373 miles
    (500—600 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 TD 26 / 43 MPG
    (9 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 Twin Spark 24 / 39 MPG
    (9.9 / 6 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    America 3.0 V6 18 / 32 MPG
    (12.9 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1985 Alfa Romeo 75 (162 B) MPG

    Vehicle Quadrifoglio Verde 2.5 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 35 MPG
    (13 / 6.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 34 MPG
    (11.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle America 1.8 Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 34 MPG
    (9.7 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 34 MPG
    (12.2 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 Turbo i.e.
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 34 MPG
    (9.7 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 28 MPG
    (9.9 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—373 miles (500—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 43 MPG
    (9 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 Twin Spark
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 39 MPG
    (9.9 / 6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle America 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 32 MPG
    (12.9 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person