cat_logo
HomeAlfa-romeo

164

Alfa Romeo 164 MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Alfa Romeo 164 MPG by Years

Alfa Romeo 164 MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Alfa Romeo 164 MPG

    • average 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 MPG: 27 MPG / 9.5 L per 100 km
    • worst 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 MPG: 13 MPG / 18.3 L per 100 km
    • best 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 MPG: 45 MPG / 5.2 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1470 kg / 3241 lbs
    • body type: sedan
    • difference highway / city: 39%
    • average engine power: 143 kW / 194 hp
    • difference from world average: 16% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 685 miles (1103 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

1987 Alfa Romeo 164 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

1987 Alfa Romeo 164 MPG is between 13 MPG and 45 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.0 T.S. — 25 to 36 MPG
  • 2.0 Turbo — 24 to 37 MPG
  • 2.0 V6 Turbo — 22 to 32 MPG
  • 2.5 TD — 29 to 45 MPG
  • 3.0 24V — 17 to 31 MPG
  • 3.0 24V Q4 — 13 to 26 MPG
  • 3.0 24V QV — 19 to 27 MPG
  • 3.0 i V6 24V — 18 to 31 MPG
  • 3.0 i.e. QV — 20 to 33 MPG
  • 3.0 V6 — 18 to 35 MPG


    1987 Alfa Romeo 164 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.0 T.S. — 48 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 Turbo — 43 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 V6 Turbo — 58 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 TD — 43 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 24V — 61 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 24V Q4 — 99 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 24V QV — 76 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 i V6 24V — 60 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 i.e. QV — 55 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 V6 — 57 kg/mpg


    1987 Alfa Romeo 164 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.

  • 2.0 T.S. is 9% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 Turbo is 9% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 V6 Turbo is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 TD is 9% more economical than average car
  • 3.0 24V is 22% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 24V Q4 is 47% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 24V QV is 31% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 i V6 24V is 22% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 i.e. QV is 19% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 V6 is 19% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 (164) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.0 T.S. 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 Turbo 24 / 37 MPG
    (9.9 / 6.3 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 V6 Turbo 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 435—559 miles
    (700—900 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 TD 29 / 45 MPG
    (8.2 / 5.2 L per 100 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% better 559—808 miles
    (900—1300 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 24V 17 / 31 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.5 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 24V Q4 13 / 26 MPG
    (18.3 / 9.1 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 47% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		2.7 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 24V QV 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 i V6 24V 18 / 31 MPG
    (13.4 / 7.5 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 i.e. QV 20 / 33 MPG
    (11.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—621 miles
    (600—1000 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 V6 18 / 35 MPG
    (12.9 / 6.8 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 (164) MPG

    Vehicle 2.0 T.S.
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 37 MPG
    (9.9 / 6.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 V6 Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—559 miles (700—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 29 / 45 MPG
    (8.2 / 5.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—808 miles (900—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 24V
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 31 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 24V Q4
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 26 MPG
    (18.3 / 9.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 47% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 24V QV
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 i V6 24V
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 31 MPG
    (13.4 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 i.e. QV
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 33 MPG
    (11.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—621 miles (600—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 35 MPG
    (12.9 / 6.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings