2004 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG is 42 MPG on engine:
The 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 16V JTD M-Jet |
26
/
42 MPG
(8.9 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
42 MPG
(8.9 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG is between 13 MPG and 50 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V T.Spark |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 16V JTD |
29
/
50 MPG
(8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 JTD |
30
/
50 MPG
(7.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V JTS |
19
/
36 MPG
(12.2 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i 16V T.Spark |
19
/
37 MPG
(12.1 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 JTD |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.8 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 i V6 24V |
13
/
28 MPG
(17.5 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 i V6 24V Q-System |
13
/
27 MPG
(17.5 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V T.Spark |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 16V JTD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
50 MPG
(8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 JTD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
50 MPG
(7.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V JTS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
36 MPG
(12.2 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V T.Spark |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
37 MPG
(12.1 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 JTD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.8 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
28 MPG
(17.5 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V Q-System |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
27 MPG
(17.5 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG is between 13 MPG and 50 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V T.Spark |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.5 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i 16V T.Spark |
19
/
36 MPG
(12.2 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 16V JTD |
29
/
49 MPG
(8.2 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 JTD |
30
/
50 MPG
(7.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 JTD |
26
/
43 MPG
(8.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 i V6 24V |
13
/
28 MPG
(17.5 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V JTS |
19
/
35 MPG
(12.5 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 i V6 24V Q-System |
13
/
27 MPG
(17.5 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V T.Spark |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.5 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V T.Spark |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
36 MPG
(12.2 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 16V JTD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
49 MPG
(8.2 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 JTD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
50 MPG
(7.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 JTD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
43 MPG
(8.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
28 MPG
(17.5 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V JTS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
35 MPG
(12.5 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V Q-System |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
27 MPG
(17.5 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2002 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG is between 13 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:
The 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 i V6 24V |
14
/
27 MPG
(17.2 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 16V T.S. |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.7 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 JTD |
30
/
48 MPG
(7.9 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 16V T.S. |
28
/
36 MPG
(8.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
497—621 miles
(800—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 JTS |
19
/
35 MPG
(12.2 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V T.Spark |
19
/
35 MPG
(12.2 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 JTD |
26
/
43 MPG
(8.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 V6 24V Q-system |
13
/
27 MPG
(17.7 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
27 MPG
(17.2 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V T.S. |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.7 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 JTD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
48 MPG
(7.9 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V T.S. |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
36 MPG
(8.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—621 miles (800—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 JTS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
35 MPG
(12.2 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V T.Spark |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
35 MPG
(12.2 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 JTD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
43 MPG
(8.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 24V Q-system |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
27 MPG
(17.7 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
2002 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG is 27 MPG on engine:
The 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 i V6 24V |
13
/
27 MPG
(18.1 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
186—435 miles
(300—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
27 MPG
(18.1 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 186—435 miles (300—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2002 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG is 27 MPG on engine:
The 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 i V6 24V |
13
/
27 MPG
(18.4 / 8.8 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
186—435 miles
(300—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
27 MPG
(18.4 / 8.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 186—435 miles (300—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG is between 13 MPG and 50 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 i V6 24V |
14
/
28 MPG
(16.5 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 16V T.S. |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 16V T.S. |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 JTD |
30
/
50 MPG
(7.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V T.Spark |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.7 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 JTS |
19
/
36 MPG
(12.2 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 JTD |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.8 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 V6 24V Q-system |
13
/
27 MPG
(17.5 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
28 MPG
(16.5 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V T.S. |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V T.S. |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 JTD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
50 MPG
(7.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V T.Spark |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.7 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 JTS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
36 MPG
(12.2 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 JTD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.8 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 24V Q-system |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
27 MPG
(17.5 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |