cat_logo
HomeAlfa-romeo

155

Alfa Romeo 155 MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Alfa Romeo 155 MPG by Years

Alfa Romeo 155 MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Alfa Romeo 155 MPG

    • average 1992 Alfa Romeo 155 MPG: 30 MPG / 8.1 L per 100 km
    • worst 1992 Alfa Romeo 155 MPG: 21 MPG / 11.4 L per 100 km
    • best 1992 Alfa Romeo 155 MPG: 41 MPG / 5.7 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1330 kg / 2933 lbs
    • body type: sedan
    • difference highway / city: 30%
    • average engine power: 101 kW / 137 hp
    • difference from world average: 6% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 551 miles (887 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

1992 Alfa Romeo 155 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

1992 Alfa Romeo 155 MPG is between 21 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.6 T.Spark 16V — 26 to 38 MPG
  • 1.8 T.Spark — 26 to 37 MPG
  • 1.7 T.Spark — 25 to 36 MPG
  • 2.0 Turbo Q4 16V — 21 to 30 MPG
  • 2.0 TD — 29 to 41 MPG
  • 2.0 T.Spark — 26 to 37 MPG
  • 2.0 T.Spark 16V — 25 to 36 MPG
  • 2.5 TD — 29 to 41 MPG
  • 2.5 V6 — 22 to 31 MPG


    1992 Alfa Romeo 155 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1992 Alfa Romeo 155 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.6 T.Spark 16V — 44 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 T.Spark — 44 kg/mpg
  • 1.7 T.Spark — 45 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 Turbo Q4 16V — 60 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 TD — 39 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 T.Spark — 44 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 T.Spark 16V — 51 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 TD — 41 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 V6 — 53 kg/mpg


    1992 Alfa Romeo 155 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1992 Alfa Romeo 155 MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.

  • 1.6 T.Spark 16V is 6% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 T.Spark is 6% less economical than average car
  • 1.7 T.Spark is 9% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 Turbo Q4 16V is 25% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 TD is 3% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 T.Spark is 9% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 T.Spark 16V is 13% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 TD is 3% more economical than average car
  • 2.5 V6 is 22% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1992 Alfa Romeo 155 (167) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.6 T.Spark 16V 26 / 38 MPG
    (9 / 6.2 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 T.Spark 26 / 37 MPG
    (9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person
    1.7 T.Spark 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 Turbo Q4 16V 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 TD 29 / 41 MPG
    (8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% better 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 T.Spark 26 / 37 MPG
    (9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 T.Spark 16V 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 TD 29 / 41 MPG
    (8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% better 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 V6 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1992 Alfa Romeo 155 (167) MPG

    Vehicle 1.6 T.Spark 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 38 MPG
    (9 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 T.Spark
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 37 MPG
    (9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.7 T.Spark
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo Q4 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 30 MPG
    (11.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 29 / 41 MPG
    (8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 T.Spark
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 37 MPG
    (9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 T.Spark 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 29 / 41 MPG
    (8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings