cat_logo
HomeAlfa-romeo

146

Alfa Romeo 146 MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Alfa Romeo 146 MPG by Years

Alfa Romeo 146 MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Alfa Romeo 146 MPG

    • average 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 MPG: 30 MPG / 8.4 L per 100 km
    • worst 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 MPG: 19 MPG / 12.4 L per 100 km
    • best 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 MPG: 47 MPG / 5 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1350 kg / 2977 lbs
    • body type: hatchback
    • difference highway / city: 38%
    • average engine power: 89 kW / 120 hp
    • difference from world average: 6% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 557 miles (897 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

1995 Alfa Romeo 146 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

1995 Alfa Romeo 146 MPG is between 19 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.4 i 16V T.Spark — 22 to 37 MPG
  • 1.4 i.e. — 25 to 36 MPG
  • 1.7 i.e. 16V — 24 to 35 MPG
  • 1.7 i.e. 16V T.S. — 20 to 36 MPG
  • 1.9 TD — 27 to 47 MPG
  • 1.6 i.e. — 25 to 36 MPG
  • 1.6 i.e. 16V T.S. — 21 to 36 MPG
  • 2.0 16V Qudrifoglio — 19 to 36 MPG
  • 2.0 16V T.S. — 25 to 36 MPG


    1995 Alfa Romeo 146 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.4 i 16V T.Spark — 41 kg/mpg
  • 1.4 i.e. — 42 kg/mpg
  • 1.7 i.e. 16V — 44 kg/mpg
  • 1.7 i.e. 16V T.S. — 47 kg/mpg
  • 1.9 TD — 38 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 i.e. — 41 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 i.e. 16V T.S. — 46 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 16V Qudrifoglio — 51 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 16V T.S. — 47 kg/mpg


    1995 Alfa Romeo 146 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.

  • 1.4 i 16V T.Spark is 13% less economical than average car
  • 1.4 i.e. is 13% less economical than average car
  • 1.7 i.e. 16V is 13% less economical than average car
  • 1.7 i.e. 16V T.S. is 19% less economical than average car
  • 1.9 TD is 9% more economical than average car
  • 1.6 i.e. is 9% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 i.e. 16V T.S. is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 16V Qudrifoglio is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 16V T.S. is 9% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 (930) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.4 i 16V T.Spark 22 / 37 MPG
    (10.7 / 6.3 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km / person
    1.4 i.e. 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km / person
    1.7 i.e. 16V 24 / 35 MPG
    (9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km / person
    1.7 i.e. 16V T.S. 20 / 36 MPG
    (11.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 TD 27 / 47 MPG
    (8.8 / 5 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% better 435—746 miles
    (700—1200 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 i.e. 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 i.e. 16V T.S. 21 / 36 MPG
    (11.3 / 6.6 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 16V Qudrifoglio 19 / 36 MPG
    (12.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 16V T.S. 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 435—559 miles
    (700—900 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 (930) MPG

    Vehicle 1.4 i 16V T.Spark
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 37 MPG
    (10.7 / 6.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.4 i.e.
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.7 i.e. 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 35 MPG
    (9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.7 i.e. 16V T.S.
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 36 MPG
    (11.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 27 / 47 MPG
    (8.8 / 5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% better
    Driving range (full tank) 435—746 miles (700—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 i.e.
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6 i.e. 16V T.S.
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 36 MPG
    (11.3 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 16V Qudrifoglio
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 36 MPG
    (12.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 16V T.S.
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—559 miles (700—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings