2012 Acura TL MPG is between 17 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Acura TL MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Acura TL MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle  Consumption (city / highway)  Consumption to weight ratio  Difference from world average consumption  Driving range (full tank)  Consumption per passenger 

3.7 V6 
17
/
25 MPG
(13.8 / 9.4 L per 100 km) 
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg  37% worse 
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) 
2.4 L per 100 km / person 
3.5 V6 
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km) 
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg  28% worse 


2 L per 100 km / person 
Vehicle  3.7 V6 

Consumption (city / highway) 
17
/
25 MPG
(13.8 / 9.4 L per 100 km) 
Consumption to weight ratio  1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 
Difference from world average consumption  37% worse 
Driving range (full tank)  311—435 miles (500—700 km) 
Consumption per passenger  2.4 L per 100 km / person 
Vehicle  3.5 V6 
Consumption (city / highway) 
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km) 
Consumption to weight ratio  1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 
Difference from world average consumption  28% worse 
Driving range (full tank)   
Consumption per passenger  2 L per 100 km / person 
2009 Acura TL MPG is between 17 MPG and 26 MPG depending on engine:
The 2009 Acura TL MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2009 Acura TL MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle  Consumption (city / highway)  Consumption to weight ratio  Difference from world average consumption  Driving range (full tank)  Consumption per passenger 

3.5 V6 
18
/
26 MPG
(13 / 9 L per 100 km) 
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg  34% worse 


2.2 L per 100 km / person 
3.7 V6 
17
/
25 MPG
(13.8 / 9.4 L per 100 km) 
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg  37% worse 


2.3 L per 100 km / person 
Vehicle  3.5 V6 

Consumption (city / highway) 
18
/
26 MPG
(13 / 9 L per 100 km) 
Consumption to weight ratio  1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 
Difference from world average consumption  34% worse 
Driving range (full tank)   
Consumption per passenger  2.2 L per 100 km / person 
Vehicle  3.7 V6 
Consumption (city / highway) 
17
/
25 MPG
(13.8 / 9.4 L per 100 km) 
Consumption to weight ratio  1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 
Difference from world average consumption  37% worse 
Driving range (full tank)   
Consumption per passenger  2.3 L per 100 km / person 
2004 Acura TL MPG is 29 MPG on engine:
The 2004 Acura TL MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Acura TL MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle  Consumption (city / highway)  Consumption to weight ratio  Difference from world average consumption  Driving range (full tank)  Consumption per passenger 

3.2 i V6 24V 
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km) 
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg  25% worse 
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) 
2 L per 100 km / person 
Vehicle  3.2 i V6 24V 

Consumption (city / highway) 
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km) 
Consumption to weight ratio  1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 
Difference from world average consumption  25% worse 
Driving range (full tank)  373—497 miles (600—800 km) 
Consumption per passenger  2 L per 100 km / person 
1999 Acura TL MPG is between 19 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 1999 Acura TL MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1999 Acura TL MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle  Consumption (city / highway)  Consumption to weight ratio  Difference from world average consumption  Driving range (full tank)  Consumption per passenger 

3.2 
19
/
27 MPG
(12.4 / 8.7 L per 100 km) 
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg  25% worse 
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) 
2 L per 100 km / person 
3.2 V6 
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) 
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg  16% worse 
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) 
1.7 L per 100 km / person 
Type S 3.2 i V6 24V 
19
/
29 MPG
(12.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) 
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg  28% worse 
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) 
2.1 L per 100 km / person 
Vehicle  3.2 

Consumption (city / highway) 
19
/
27 MPG
(12.4 / 8.7 L per 100 km) 
Consumption to weight ratio  1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 
Difference from world average consumption  25% worse 
Driving range (full tank)  311—435 miles (500—700 km) 
Consumption per passenger  2 L per 100 km / person 
Vehicle  3.2 V6 
Consumption (city / highway) 
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) 
Consumption to weight ratio  1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 
Difference from world average consumption  16% worse 
Driving range (full tank)  435—559 miles (700—900 km) 
Consumption per passenger  1.7 L per 100 km / person 
Vehicle  Type S 3.2 i V6 24V 
Consumption (city / highway) 
19
/
29 MPG
(12.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) 
Consumption to weight ratio  1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 
Difference from world average consumption  28% worse 
Driving range (full tank)  311—497 miles (500—800 km) 
Consumption per passenger  2.1 L per 100 km / person 