2012 Acura TL MPG is between 17 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Acura TL MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Acura TL MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.7 V6 |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.8 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 V6 |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
-
|
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.8 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2009 Acura TL MPG is between 17 MPG and 26 MPG depending on engine:
The 2009 Acura TL MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2009 Acura TL MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
18
/
26 MPG
(13 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
-
|
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.7 V6 |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.8 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
-
|
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(13 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.8 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2004 Acura TL MPG is 29 MPG on engine:
The 2004 Acura TL MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Acura TL MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 i V6 24V |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
1999 Acura TL MPG is between 19 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 1999 Acura TL MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1999 Acura TL MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.4 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
3.2 V6 |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Type S 3.2 i V6 24V |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.4 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Type S 3.2 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |