2016 Acura RDX MPG is 29 MPG on engine:
The 2016 Acura RDX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 Acura RDX MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Acura RDX MPG is 28 MPG on engine:
The 2013 Acura RDX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Acura RDX MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
20
/
28 MPG
(11.8 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
28 MPG
(11.8 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Acura RDX MPG is 23 MPG on engine:
The 2010 Acura RDX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Acura RDX MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 |
18
/
23 MPG
(12.8 / 10.3 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
23 MPG
(12.8 / 10.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2007 Acura RDX MPG is 23 MPG on engine:
The 2007 Acura RDX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2007 Acura RDX MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 |
19
/
23 MPG
(12.38 / 10.22 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
23 MPG
(12.38 / 10.22 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |