2016 Acura NSX MPG is 22 MPG on engine:
The 2016 Acura NSX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 Acura NSX MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
20
/
22 MPG
(11.8 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—373 miles
(500—600 km) |
5.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
22 MPG
(11.8 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—373 miles (500—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 5.6 L per 100 km / person |
1995 Acura NSX MPG is 29 MPG on engine:
The 1995 Acura NSX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Acura NSX MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 i V6 24V |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
5.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 5.2 L per 100 km / person |
1990 Acura NSX MPG is between 17 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:
The 1990 Acura NSX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1990 Acura NSX MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 i V6 24V |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
5.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.2 i V6 24V |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.9 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 5.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.9 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 6 L per 100 km / person |