2019 Acura ILX MPG is 34 MPG on engine:
The 2019 Acura ILX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2019 Acura ILX MPG is up to 13% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2016 Acura ILX MPG is 36 MPG on engine:
The 2016 Acura ILX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 Acura ILX MPG is up to 9% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Acura ILX MPG is between 22 MPG and 39 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Acura ILX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Acura ILX MPG is up to 19% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 |
39
/
38 MPG
(6 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
497—497 miles
(800—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.7 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.8 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
39
/
38 MPG
(6 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—497 miles (800—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.7 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.8 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |