2010 Acura CSX MPG is 36 MPG on engine:
The 2010 Acura CSX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Acura CSX MPG is up to 9% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Acura CSX MPG is 37 MPG on engine:
The 2006 Acura CSX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Acura CSX MPG is up to 0% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V |
28
/
37 MPG
(8.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
37 MPG
(8.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |