2001 Acura CL MPG is between 19 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Acura CL MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Acura CL MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 i V6 24V Type S |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.2 i V6 24V |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 i V6 24V Type S |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Acura CL MPG is between 20 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Acura CL MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Acura CL MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 i 16V |
25
/
31 MPG
(9.6 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i V6 24V |
20
/
28 MPG
(11.8 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
31 MPG
(9.6 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
28 MPG
(11.8 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |